authorityresearch.com

Political Correctness ...

by
Dean Gotcher

... is paradigm correctness, where how a person feels, thinks, and acts, relates with his "self" and with others, and responds toward authority determines his or her worth or value. The 'purpose' of "P.C.," i.e., political correctness is to 'change' ('shift') a persons paradigm from honoring the father's/Father's authority to questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking it instead, 'justifying' the child's desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation), which the world stimulates over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, making the child "of and for self," i.e., of and for the world only so he, along with the psychologist, i.e., the psychotherapist, i.e., the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the Transformational Marxist (all being the same in paradigm) can do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience, i.e., so everyone can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.

"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)

By "shifting" education from the father's/Father's paradigm, i.e., from using a Patriarchal curriculum (curriculum/paradigm is a political system), i.e., 1) preaching commands and rules to be obeyed as given, teaching facts and truth to be accepted as is (by faith), and discussing any questions that might come up (at the one in authority's discretion; providing there is time, the person is able to understand, and they are not challenging or questioning authority), 2) rewarding or blessing those who obey and/or do things right, 3) chastening or correcting those who disobey and/or do things wrong, and 4) casting out or rejecting any who question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack authority to the child's paradigm, 'justifying' the child's love for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates (including the pleasure which comes with "group approval, i.e., affirmation) and the child's hate of restraint (hate of missing out on pleasure, including hating the one getting in pleasures way), i.e., to the Heresiarchal curriculum of 'change,' i.e., to the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (being used in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "positive," soviet, brainwashing classroom—from pre-school to post-graduate, in all vocations, professions, and institutions today, including not only in public education but in private, Christian, and increasingly the home school education system as well) 'changes' the child's paradigm from honoring and obeying authority to questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking it instead. PC begins in the classroom (group meeting), including in the "church," i.e., "youth group" and spreads everywhere from there.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

"Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin ["lusts," i.e., carnal desires of the flesh and eyes] unto death, or of obedience [to the Father] unto righteousness?" Romans 6:16

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2019